Humanity Beyond The Politics
© Peter Crayford, "Australian Financial Review", June 27, 1997
Rarely does a war film grab your emotions and your imagination as you become
consumed by the drama.
An old Russian saying, "It's easier to kill a man than to love him" underpins
this cri de coeur against the cynicism of war and the delusions of empire. Boris
Yeltsin reportedly saw Prisoner of the Mountains and not long afterwards opened
negotiations for peace with Chechnya. So deeply affecting is this film that it
is not difficult to understand why.
There is a moment in the best films when acting ceases and the characters just
appear to behave. So right is the casting, so relaxed are the performances and
so unobtrusive is the direction that they swallow you up and you find yourself
enveloped by the drama of their lives.
This is the case with this film, screened at Cannes in 1996 where it won the
International Critics Prize and the Audience Award. Its title here is Prisoner
of the Mountains but it has screened elsewhere as The Prisoner of the Caucasus
(Kavazskii plennik).
Although no definite location is named it is clear that the film has resonances
with the war in Chechnya while its title echoes that of Tolstoy's novella
Caucasian Captive from which the film draws inspiration.
History repeats itself in this region with terrifying monotony. The Caucasus
have been at war, struggling on and off for independence, for centuries. While
we may be familiar with the beauty of their rugs, the culture of countries like
Armenia, Azerbaijan, Osetiya, Inguhetiya, Georgia and Abkhasiya remain something
of a mystery to most Australians; a mystery prised open by this film.
Because of the difficulties of filming in Chechnya, shooting was undertaken in
the neighbouring country of Dagestan. And spectacular it proves to be. The
opening helicopter shot of a stone village clinging precariously to the shoulder
of a hill, surrounded by precipitous mountains, takes your breath away. And
because the location is so remote, many of the local inhabitants were hired as
extras, providing the film with a convincing and colourful authenticity.
At one point, during a hellish shooting schedule spread over seven months in a
village without electricity or running water, the security guards (a group of
wrestlers who feature in one scene of the film), took the crew hostage, and only
released them after a financial settlement was arranged. A case of life
imitating art.
The broad story is a familiar one of an empire in decline struggling to impose
its will on a resentful, subject people. But the film takes a more intimate
route revealing greater truths by observing the geopolitical writ small, through
the rituals of ordinary daily life.
Abdoul-Mourat, a Muslim village elder (played by Djemal Sikharulidze) captures a
novice Russian conscript Vania (played by the director's son Sergei Bodrov jnr)
and an experienced soldier Sacha (Oleg Menshikov of Burnt By The Sun).
Chained to one another, the two Russians are kept alive for 10 days while
negotiations take place with a cynical military commander in the vain hope of
effecting an exchange for Abdoul's son, detained by the Russian forces. A
friendship develops between the two Russian soldiers and between the conscript
and his captor's young daughter, Dina, touchingly played by a local 12-year-old,
Susanna Mekhralieva. When the conscript's mother arrives to plead for his
release their captivity ends but not before one of them lies dead. It is
revealing of the director's sympathies that at the end the Muslim elder shows
more humanity than the would-be Russian conquerors.
The Russian soldiers, the epitome of innocence and experience, haven't an
inkling of understanding for the people they have been sent to subjugate and
conquer. The contrast between their culture, in manners, in religion, and
materiality is painfully evident.
Yet the director, Sergei Bodrov, sympathises with the Caucasians and their
motives, observing their way of life with care and obvious affection. What
connects the Russians and the Caucasians is a tenuous thread of common humanity.
Bodrov is critical of his countrymen. In one scene a Russian soldier buys two
bottles of vodka, slamming his military pistol on to the counter as payment. Nor
is the film without humour or tenderness. The scene when the two Russians break
into spontaneous dancing after a binge on illicit, village alcohol is both
spontaneous and wry.
Prisoner Of The Mountains refuses easy solutions to complex human predicaments.
Its brilliance lies in its simplicity which grasps the imagination like a force
of nature. One of the year's best films.
Submitted by Anni Nikolova
|