The Barber of Siberia
© Julian Graffy, "Sight and Sound"
For two decades Nikita Mikhalkov, born into a family of the Soviet cultural
elite, has been the most famous of Russian film directors both in his own
country and abroad. Mikhalkov's celebrity status - consolidated in December
1997 when he became chairman of the Russian Union of Film-makers - has
turned the release of his recent films into major media events in Russia,
none more so than "The Barber of Siberia". By the time of its premiere in the
Kremlin Palace of Congresses in February 1999 the film had already generated
acres of newsprint, as much because of its enormous budget (reported as $45
million) and its link to Mikhalkov's alleged desire to be president of
Russia as for its epic proportions and ambitions. Here was a film that would
restore national self-esteem and re-invigorate cinemagoing in Mikhalkov's
native land, as well as explain the enigmas of Russian identity to expectant
western audiences, perhaps even picking up the Academy Award for Best
Foreign Language Film on the way.
In Russia the film did attract huge and satisfied audiences, though the
critical reception was mixed, if not cool. But its Cannes showing last year
was a fiasco, and it subsequently failed to impress the Oscar voters. With
this damaged reputation The Barber of Siberia limps belatedly into the UK.
It would be wrong to look to "The Barber of Siberia" for historical
authenticity or cultural specificity - the film, in Mikhalkov's own words,
is "not about how things were but about how things should be." So we are
served a mythological stew, a souvenir Russia made up of vast birch forests
and famous Moscow landmarks, epic drinking, fatal passion and doomed love
leading to duel, scandal and exile in the Siberian snow. In what seems like
a concession to ignorant western audiences, the hero is given a famous
Russian name, Tolstoy, but to make them feel at ease this Tolstoy admits he
couldn't make it to the end of Anna Karenina. Perhaps some western viewers
will be satisfied with this reading of Russia, but its greatest appeal is
surely to Russian audiences so exhausted by their recent tribulations that
they will embrace any lazy reiteration of warmed-over cliche without pausing
to wonder why the young officers to whom the film is dedicated are so
childish and their mentor is a drunk. Western audiences may balk, however,
at being represented only by rogues, or by Sergeant 'Mad Dog' O'Leary (Mac
MacDonald), who thinks Mozart is a girl, and a Russian one at that.
The film's aspirations to represent the relationship between Russia and the
US in symbolic form are not supported by any psychological acuity in the
characterisation. The bigger the role, the more the actor flounders. Julia
Ormond is too bland to convey either the scheming or the bitter regrets of
Jane Callahan. Oleg Menshikov, meanwhile, an actor of great range and
emotional subtlety, has been badly cast in the role of Andrei Tolstoy;
pushing 40 when he made the film, he is reduced to rehearsing the pert
mannerisms of an ingenu. After his embarrassing declaration to Jane in the
presence of Radlov (Alexey Petrenko), he asks "May I be excused?", which is
likely only to provoke inappropriate memories of the classroom among British
audiences. The best acting comes in the cameo roles, from Marina Neelova as
Tolstoy's actress mother and Elizabeth Spriggs as the countess Perepyolkina.
The exiguous and predictable plot is fleshed out by a number of grandly
staged set pieces, including a ball, Russian Shrovetide celebrations, a
parade before Tzsar Alexander III (played by the director himself), the
production of the opera, the depredations of McCracken's monstrous machine.
You can, at least, see where the money has gone. The film concludes with a
sly double ending, happy for western audiences - young Andrew wins his
battle over Mozart, whom he refuses to defame at his military camp - and
tragic for Russians, just the way they like it: his parents are not reunited.
On the way it tries first to make us laugh, then, less successfully, to
make us cry through a slew of novelistic cliches. Occasionally, the film
comes alive - Menshikov playing Figaro in a production of The Marriage of
Figaro finally casts off the strait-jacket of having to play a much younger
character; his assault on Radlov is also one of the film's most powerful
scenes.
Mikhalkov's finest films "Unfinished Piece for Mechanical Piano", "Five
Evenings" and "Urga" demonstrate that he is best at the small scale, at the
delicate rendering of intense human emotion. His old-fashioned and seemingly
interminable "Barber" discards these qualities as insouciantly as McCracken
(Richard Harris) despoils the Siberian forest. What remains seems ill suited
as a model, either for Russian society or for Russian cinema.
Submitted by Kay
|